It was casual, clear and still mattered
OctoberTrainHome · Posted 16 Sep 2026, 07:04
I’m 42 and I’ve just finished five months of seeing someone without either of us wanting it to become a relationship. That sentence usually gets treated as the beginning of a disaster, so I wanted to write down one time when it wasn’t. We met in May. He was working near me on a temporary contract and returning to Glasgow in October. I had come out of a long relationship in January and did not want to plan another future with anybody. He did not want long distance and I did not want him to reconsider. We agreed that we were dating other people, although in practice neither of us did much. We normally met once a week. We did not meet families. We did meet a few friends because hiding would have felt stranger than just saying, “This is the person I’m seeing.” About six weeks in, we checked whether the arrangement still worked. Then we checked again in August because I noticed I was starting to dread October. I did not secretly want him to stay. I wanted time to stop passing, which is not quite the same thing. He left on Monday. We cooked at mine on Sunday, gave back the small collection of things we had accumulated and talked about whether we should stay friends. We decided not yet. Maybe later, after enough time that friendship would not be a way of continuing the same relationship by text. I cried after he left. I have also not messaged him asking whether we made a mistake. The ending hurts, but it does not make the five months dishonest or unhealthy. We wanted the same thing, kept asking whether we still wanted it and stopped when the arrangement reached the end we had known about from the beginning. I think I am posting because “casual” sometimes gets used to mean careless. This was not careless. It was limited. There is a difference.
What should they do? · 34 votes
Log in or create a free account to vote and reply.
Replies (14)
Be honest. Be kind. No real names.
Log in to reply.
I like that you did not promise immediate friendship just to soften Sunday. Returning his things and allowing a real ending gives any later friendship a better chance of being something new.
The repeated check-ins are what make this feel careful rather than avoidant. You both knew the limit, noticed when the ending started to hurt and did not use that hurt to rewrite the agreement.
Crying after a clear, mutually chosen ending does not prove the arrangement was secretly unhealthy. Sometimes grief is simply the cost of something meaningful reaching its agreed limit.
Calling this cold misses the fact that both people named the limit, checked it twice and stopped when the agreed ending arrived. He did not move back under the impression that a relationship was waiting for him.
The ending hurts because the five months mattered, not because either person secretly broke the agreement. Choosing some distance before friendship sounds like another act of care rather than a rejection of what they had.
The line between limited and careless is important. You both kept checking whether the arrangement still worked, and choosing distance before friendship protected the ending you had agreed to.
They say neither person dated much, but the option remained part of the agreement. Weekly dates and sadness at the ending do not turn a mutually limited arrangement into a hidden commitment.
This is a useful reminder that a relationship can end sadly without having failed. The five months were limited, but both of you kept choosing them honestly until the agreed ending arrived.
I had a relationship with a known moving date too, and the ending felt like relief and heartbreak at the same time. Sadness did not mean the agreement had been dishonest.
Five months with a known ending was not necessarily wasted. They both chose the arrangement, checked that it still worked and ended it honestly when the agreed limit arrived.
The ending can hurt even when both people were careful and honest. I think taking real distance before attempting friendship respects what the five months meant.
He knew the arrangement was limited and chose it too. Feeling sad when the contract ended does not make either person a placeholder, especially when they checked in about the limit more than once.
With the move three months away, pretending the date is not coming will make the ending harder to handle. A check-in does not have to turn the arrangement into a relationship; it can clarify how you both want to use the remaining time.
Five months that both people wanted were not nothing simply because they ended. The post is honest that a limited relationship can matter without needing to become permanent to justify the time.