I want him. I don’t want him moving in with my son
TwoHomesAndASon · Posted 10 Sep 2026, 07:06
I’m 43, divorced, and I have a ten-year-old son. I have been with my boyfriend for eighteen months. He wants us to move in together next spring. I do not. The confusing bit is that I do want him. I introduce him as my partner, we are exclusive, our friends and families know about us and I can imagine still being with him in ten years. This is not me keeping him hidden or waiting for someone better. I just do not want him living with my son yet. My divorce was ugly and the two years afterwards were chaotic. My son finally has a routine that feels safe. He likes my boyfriend, but liking the man who comes for dinner is not the same as sharing a bathroom with him, having him there on difficult mornings or working out whether he gets a say when my son is rude. My boyfriend has never tried to take over. He has no children, though, and I think he imagines moving in as mainly more evenings together and half the rent. I imagine school runs, discipline, privacy, his things in my son’s space and my son feeling that another adult decision has rearranged his home. We talked about it on Sunday. He said that after eighteen months, living separately makes him feel as though I am keeping the relationship at weekends. I said I would happily spend more weekdays together and plan further ahead. He said that was still avoiding the next step. I asked what the next step was supposed to prove. He said commitment. That annoyed me because I do not think access to my child’s home is the price of proving I love someone. Then he said something fair. He does not want to be fitted around a family indefinitely without knowing whether there will ever be room for him inside it. He is not asking to become my son’s father, but he does want a shared daily life eventually. I realised we have both been saying “serious relationship” while picturing different things. For him, seriousness means building one home. For me, seriousness currently means consistency, loyalty and making decisions together while keeping two homes. Neither version is ridiculous. They may not be compatible. I have asked for three months to talk through the actual practical questions instead of arguing about whether either of us is committed enough. What role would he have with my son? What privacy would everyone keep? What happens if living together does not work? Does he genuinely want family life, including the inconvenient parts, or does he mainly want more of me? I am not promising that the answer will be moving in. He is not promising he can remain in a relationship where it never happens. It feels frightening to make the disagreement more specific because we might discover there is no plan that works for both of us. But “not yet” cannot be my permanent answer just because I am scared of disrupting my son, and “next step” cannot be his answer to every concern I raise. We need to find out whether this is a timing problem or two different ideas of partnership.
What should they do? · 31 votes
Log in or create a free account to vote and reply.
Replies (15)
Be honest. Be kind. No real names.
Log in to reply.
Living together is a major decision when a child is involved, and your concerns deserve more than a simple deadline. His wish to know whether a shared home is ever possible is also reasonable. The practical conversation you are proposing sounds necessary for all three of you.
Your son’s home is not simply the next relationship milestone, so slowing this down makes sense. I also appreciate that you heard your boyfriend’s fear of being permanently fitted around the edges. The practical questions are where the real compatibility will show.
The three-month period will only help if it ends with an actual decision, even if that decision is that you need separate homes indefinitely. Otherwise it risks becoming another version of “not yet” while he continues waiting for a future you may not want.
Reading about blended families could be useful if they do it together, but it should not become a pass-or-fail test. The questions she listed about roles, privacy and what happens if cohabitation fails are already a strong place to begin.
The question about whether he wants the inconvenient parts of family life matters more than whether he likes the idea of sharing rent. I would include an ordinary school-night trial in those three months, not only conversations about a future home.
Balancing your son’s stability with a partner’s wish for a shared daily life is difficult. I like that you are turning “the next step” into specific questions about routines, privacy and his role with your son.
The ordinary school-night trial sounds useful, but I would also give your son an age-appropriate way to say what feels comfortable without making him responsible for the final decision. His home is changing too.
Protecting your son matters, but your partner is also entitled to decide whether two homes indefinitely work for him. The three-month conversation should clarify compatibility without making either of you the problem.
Protecting her son’s stable home is not proof that she lacks commitment. Her partner’s wish for a shared household is also legitimate, which is why they need to decide whether their two versions of partnership can coexist.
He deserves a clear answer about whether living together is part of the future, but that answer does not have to be yes. The important thing is not to let him assume a move is simply delayed if you already know you do not want it.
The point about the living room being your son's home matters. Wanting a relationship and wanting someone to move into your child's space are separate decisions.
One difficult Tuesday dinner would not recreate the reality of sharing a home, and her son should not become a test. They are better served discussing discipline, privacy and routines before trying longer stretches of ordinary family time.
Wanting more time before changing her son’s home does not mean he only wants a girlfriend. He has also been clear that he eventually wants shared daily life, so they need to decide whether the timing and destination can work for both.
Moving in should not happen simply because eighteen months has passed, especially when a child’s home is involved. The three-month discussion can test whether he understands the daily reality without assuming the answer must be no forever.
It can feel like choosing between a partner and a child when the housing question becomes urgent. The useful shift here is that they are discussing roles, routines and privacy instead of using cohabitation as a simple test of love.