I loved her. I still didn’t want the future she wanted
KitchenTableAnswer · Posted 6 Sep 2026, 07:01
I’m 37 and non-binary. I was seeing a woman for just under two years and we ended things in June. We never had much trouble with labels. She was my girlfriend, I was her partner, our friends knew and we spent Christmas with her family last year. From the outside it probably looked like we had avoided the grey-zone problem entirely. The grey bit was children. She had always said she wanted them. I had always said I wasn’t sure. At the beginning that felt honest because I genuinely wasn’t. I could imagine parts of it: reading stories, ridiculous school plays, teaching a small person to cook. Then I would imagine the relentlessness, the noise, the money and the fact that you cannot simply decide on a difficult Tuesday that parenthood is no longer for you. She is 35, so “not sure” could not stay harmless forever. Last autumn she asked whether I thought I was moving towards an answer. I said I needed more time. We agreed to talk again after Christmas. Christmas came and went. Then her sister had a baby and the subject became impossible to keep theoretical. I loved seeing her with her niece. I also noticed that none of it made me want a child of my own. I did not tell her that immediately. I kept waiting for a feeling to arrive because everything else between us worked. We laughed constantly, handled disagreements well and had built a life I actually liked. I thought ending a good relationship over a person who did not even exist yet sounded insane. By March she was sending me links to fertility clinics and asking whether I would come to an information evening. I said work was too busy that week. That was the point when she stopped accepting “unsure” as a complete answer. We had one horrible, calm conversation at her kitchen table. She asked if there were no deadlines, no fertility worries and no risk of losing her, would I actively choose to become a parent? The answer was no. I cried before I managed to say it. She cried afterwards. Neither of us shouted. She said she believed that I loved her, but she could not give up children in order to keep me and trust that she would never resent it. I understood. For another month we behaved as if understanding the problem had solved it. We went away for a weekend, cooked dinner, watched our series and barely mentioned the future. It was lovely. It was also a goodbye neither of us wanted to name. We ended it properly in June. I have had moments since where I’ve thought I should have just said yes. Usually on Sunday mornings when I miss waking up beside her, or when something funny happens and she is still the first person I want to tell. But wanting her back is not the same as wanting to raise a child. She messaged me last week to say she has started looking into becoming a parent on her own. I felt proud of her, devastated for us and relieved that she is no longer waiting for my uncertainty to turn into permission. I sometimes see people say that if you truly love someone, you find a way. I think we did love each other. The loving thing was admitting there was no compromise where neither of us lost a life we genuinely wanted.
What should they do? · 102 votes
Log in or create a free account to vote and reply.
Replies (34)
Be honest. Be kind. No real names.
Log in to reply.
The part I would challenge is waiting after the clinic invitation. By then, I think you already knew. I understand why you delayed saying it, but she was making time-sensitive decisions while you were hoping the answer might change on its own.
Continuing after you had largely reached a no had consequences for her, especially because time mattered to the decision about children. I understand why the answer was painful to give, but delaying it also deserves honest reflection.
This is one of those incompatibilities where compromise is impossible because there is no half-version of becoming a parent. Loving her did not make your no dishonest, and loving you did not make her future negotiable.
I feel this. I am facing a similar decision and keep hoping my answer will change, although deep down I suspect it will not. Knowing that does not make saying it any easier.
Loving someone and wanting a different future can be true at the same time. Their calm ending sounds painful precisely because neither person could turn the incompatibility into a villain.
Children are not a small compromise, even when everything else works. Wanting the relationship back cannot safely stand in for wanting the life that would come with it.
Her message about becoming a parent on her own must have hurt, but it also shows why the ending mattered. She can act on the future she wants, and you are no longer being pushed towards a yes that would shape three lives.
That extra month after the kitchen-table conversation makes sense to me. You had understood the incompatibility before either of you was emotionally ready to lose the ordinary life around it.
I am sorry. It is a painful position when love remains but the futures each person wants cannot be combined.
This moved me because my former partner and I separated over the same difference. I still miss him, but wanting the person was not the same as wanting the life he needed.
I’m sorry. Loving her and still not wanting parenthood left no painless option, but your clear answer allowed her to pursue the future she wants rather than keep waiting for your uncertainty to change.
I am facing a similar mismatch, and the distinction between missing someone and wanting their future is useful. Those feelings can exist together without changing the answer.
I spent years waiting for someone to decide whether they wanted children, so I understand how costly uncertainty can become. The important difference here is that you eventually gave a definite answer and accepted that she was free to act on it.
I am in a similar position now, where love is present but the future questions do not match. Reading how you finally answered the question has made me realise that postponing mine is still a decision with consequences.
The calm way you both handled the final conversation does not make the loss smaller. It sounds painful for both of you, especially because the relationship itself worked while your decisions about children did not.
I hope both of you find some peace with the decision. Missing her does not mean you should promise a future involving children that you do not genuinely want.
You cannot create a desire for parenthood simply because the rest of the relationship works. Giving her a clear answer allowed both of you to pursue the futures you actually wanted.
It was fair for her to need an answer, and delaying it did cost her time. But calling the entire relationship selfish ignores that you were genuinely uncertain and ultimately gave the clear answer she needed.
Wanting her back on lonely mornings does not mean you should promise a life with children that you do not want. Muting her updates for a while might give both of you room without turning the ending into hostility.
The question about children cannot be solved by loving each other harder. I hope you can talk about it directly, because neither person should have to surrender a whole future while pretending the loss is a compromise.
Letting her go before either of you had to surrender a future was painful, but it respected both answers. Love could not create a fair compromise on having children.
Seeing updates about her next steps may make the ending harder to absorb, so muting them for a while could be protective. That is different from trying to erase a relationship that was loving and significant.
Avoiding the fertility-clinic conversation by blaming work was unfair, and the author recognises it as the moment uncertainty became postponement. Admitting the answer allowed her to stop waiting for a future he did not want.
He took too long to say that he did not want children, and that delay had consequences for her. The final conversation was still necessary because agreeing out of fear of losing her would have created a much larger harm.
Wanting the person while not wanting parenthood is a brutal combination. Reading this helped me separate those two truths without treating either person as wrong.
I stayed in a similar relationship hoping my answer about children would change. It did not, and delaying the conversation made both of us more miserable. Ending it before resentment took over was painful but honest.
The final honesty was painful, but it released both of them from waiting for a compromise that did not exist. She can now make decisions about parenthood without their uncertainty controlling the timeline.
I think ending it was the right decision even though it hurts. I also spent months hoping my answer about children would change, and the delay only increased the guilt for both of us.
Avoiding the fertility-clinic conversation by blaming work was unfair because they already suspected the answer. They acknowledge that delay, and finally giving a clear no allowed her to pursue the future she wants.
I spent a long time hoping I would suddenly want parenthood because I loved my partner. Admitting that love and the future were pointing in different directions was painful, but it was not a failure to love.
The delay mattered because her partner had limited time to make decisions about children. They have owned that mistake plainly, and the eventual no gave both people information that another extension of “unsure” would have withheld.
The firmer issue is that “not ready” stopped being the whole truth once you knew you did not want that future with her. You have owned that delay, and the clear ending was kinder than offering a relationship you still did not want.
I once tried to persuade myself that I could give up the family life I wanted to keep a relationship. Affection made the incompatibility harder to accept, but it did not create a future both of us could choose.
this hit me hard. currently in the same boat, pretending everything is fine while knowing full well we want different things. it really sucks knowing it has to end eventually.